February 2009


I read a newspaper article in which the reporter went to interview a director whom the reporter thinks his movie (referring the director) not that nice. Personally, I think it is immature way of conducting a research or interview in which you have make a judgment.

Ok, back to the main point. If you are to choose a movie, which one will you choose to watch? Money No Enough 2 or IP man…I watched both movies…I introduced Money No Enough 2 to some of my friends and their response were “From today onwards, they need to filter any of my suggestion” They did not think Money No Enough 2 is good enough to catch their attention.

What is your purpose of watching a movie? Do you want to learn or just watch? It’s a different perpective. You can’t judge this movie is not good because we do not like it. We have to look from different angle.

My views:

Money No Enough 2: It was a touching movie. It did taught how to love family member. Be appreciative to one another.

Ip Man: A Hero who only knows fair and justice. A person who takes care of his clan and their own pride.

Most probably I will update on this posting later on…Comments are welcome…

http://myhomilia.blogspot.com/2009/02/open-letter-to-friend.html

Few questions to ponder and reflect:

a) How Jesus understand about His ministry and serving?

b) Is it God’s ministry restricted to the border of the church building?

c) What is true meaning “vocation”? What is the true meaning “God’s calling into His ministry”?

d) One of God’s attribute is omnipresence, He is everywhere that we can found him. However to some extent, some people restricted or limiting full time ministry only workable in the church and not outside the church. If we truly understand this attribute, we will know that God’s ministry should be done everywhere instead limiting ourselves to one space.  

Bro. Jonathan, we will pray for you. Be strong and stand firm if you truly believes that God is guiding you back to the marketplace. All the best.

http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/index.php/business/18653-72m-more-asians-to-be-jobless-in-2009

Guys, take a minute off and do browse through the link that I paste it above. I just do not know how to comment, but to open my heart and mind and to pray for those who are needed.

Almost every couple will have the tendency to celebrate this wonderful day called “Valentine’s Day.”

But what is the background of this “romantic” day? I browse through Wikipedia (online encyclopedia) and got this answer.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valentine%27s_day

After reading those informations, what do you think about Valentine’s Day? You can leave your comments. Thank you.

Labu: Labi, I just bought a pair of shoes. Macam mana? Boleh?

Labi: Ish, cantiknya….Where did you get this shoes?

Labu: From XYZ shop..

Labi: Ehh, I went to that shop before. But I didn’t saw this pair of shoes la…Which floor?

Labu: 2nd floor la…Nice??

Labi: Nice la…Can I try??

Labu: Sure…

Labi: Labu, it’s does not fit my feet size la…

Labu: Yalor, I bought this shoes according to my size…But can you feel the softness of the shoes?

Labi: Yes, but I don’t like it….It’s not preference…

_________________________________________________________

Moral of the story:

- We can go to the same shop and we choose a pair of shoe that suit us. However the shoe that fit to us might not be suitable for others…

- When we prefer that kind of shoes, someone who likes the design of the shoes, might not prefer the interior of the shoes..

- We can hardly satisfied everyone because each one of us have own one preferences….

This will be my last post for “Perak political drama”…..(I hope so, haha)

My advice to all who browse through my blog is: Stop finger-point to Sultan. He knows what is the best for Perak. I believe he is in dilemma too. Step into his shoes and feel what he is emotionally going through now.

Check this out:

1) http://rockybru.com.my/2009/02/i-know-what-sultan-azlan-did-last-march.html

2) http://www.mysinchew.com/node/20902?tid=4

Quotes from YB Lim Kit Siang: (http://blog.limkitsiang.com/2009/02/06/constitutional-scandal-of-two-perak-mbs-abdullah-should-support-dissolution-and-state-elections/)

Last year’s general election results were the outcome of the exercise of the constitutional and democratic rights of the people of Perak to elect the government of their choice, while the present attempt to oust the legitimate Pakatan Rakyat government by UMNO and Barisan Nasional is a most unethical and opportunistic power-play frustrating the verdict of the voters in the March 8 general election last year.”

For your information, I’m not trying to side BN. But I just could not understand. It’s irony. PR blames BN for taking opportunity against them. Because of this opportunity done by BN caused Perak’s state goverment under PR to be collapsed. He said “this is the most unethical and opportunistic power-play”.  

My question: how about PR intentions of taking over federal government by “asking” some of BN MP’s to crossover or to defect so that they will be able to form a federal government? Is it an ethical approach?

My friends who supported PR will definitely argue by giving a lot of reasons (corruption, cronyism and etc). They will OK to BN to defect PR because PR will give this nation a new outlook and bringing in more changes. I do agree that we need to change.

But is it through defections to another party? I don’t think it will solve the root of problems in our nation.

http://chunwai08.blogspot.com/2009/02/stop-political-frogs-end-party-hopping.html

News flash: PM: Zambri Kadir, the Pangkor Assemblyman, to be sworn in as MB tomorrow

News flash: Police and FRU have taken over the State Secretariat building, state secretary asked state exco members and staff to leave.

There should be no place for political frogs. Malaysians must tell our politicians they cannot accept such unprincipled politicians. It does not matter whether they are from BN, PKR, DAP or PAS but there should be laws to stop such unethical politicians. There has to be consistency, however, when we push for such legislation. There cannot be a right to a wrong. If a BN elected representative joins Pakatan Rakyat, it is still wrong. It cannot be right. We cannot justify it simply because of our political emotions.

It should be the same when a Pakatan Rakyat elected representative defects to the BN. Many of us choose to forget the Pakatan Rakyat’s attempt to capture the federal government after the March 8 polls. Despite the BN being democratically elected to lead the federal government, the PR went on a frog-hunting trip. In fact, Tian Chua even said the collapse of the BN federal government was inevitable and a foregone conclusion. He even went on a trip to Taiwan, together with a few top leaders, to get BN MPs to defect. Not many people seemed ready to condemn such actions.

Even Yong Teck Lee and his SAPP MPs pulled out of the BN despite being voted on BN tickets. Their actions then were cheered by PR leaders and supporters, regarding it as a prelude to Sept 16. The defections were then justified purportedly on moral grounds and political righteousness. It’s time for a law to stop party hopping.

AND THIS

http://www.jeffooi.com/2009/02/perak_a_test_on_the_wisdom_of.php#comments

had the misfortune of foretelling something about Perak on May 13 last year. What I said took months, not days, to unfold.

As you know by now, the equation has changed in Perak politics, and it will change forever in the next few hours when Malaysia wakes up again to greet February 5, 2009.

For now, the Umno-dominated BN has the upper hand. What used to be in the favour of the Pakatan Rakyat coalition with a 31 vs. 28 equation on February 3, it’s now officially 28 vs. 28 + 3, with the three defectors claiming a convenient Independent platform.

Seizing the fait accompli of the day, Najib declared that BN is ready to form the new Perak state government while the PR was trying to gain the royal consent to dissolve the 11-month old state assembly, and to seek fresh mandate through a state-wide election.

Sultan Azlan Shah, the former king of Malaysia, is now the proverbial “King Maker” as it’s only he who can decide if BN’s wishes is accomplished, or his subjects should go to poll again to determine the next state government.

To the rakyat, they have to get prepared to new political scenario with new shades of political representation.

Take a look at the figures.

Zero-sum game?

With one defector, the DAP is currently left with 17 state assemblymen. PKR, which lost two YBs who defected, is now made up of a 5-assemblymen team. Only PAS remains intact with 6 YBs.

Of what used to be a slim majority state government under Pakatan Rakyat, the 11-member Perak Exco consists of 6 Chinese (5 DAP. 1 PKR), 4 Malays (2 PAS, 2 PKR) and 1 Indian (DAP).

The Speaker and his Deputy are from DAP — 1 Indian and 1 Chinese.

One the other hand, Perak BN survived GE2008 with 28 state assemblymen — 27 Umno and 1 from MCA. Gerakan and MIC were annihilated.

Now with 3 defectors from PR and its own defector who switched camp to PKR and make a swift comeback in two short weeks, Perak BN has now 31 YBs — 29 Umno Malays, and 2 Chinese, if you look at the typical BN politics from its race-based perspective.

Should BN take control of the Perak state government in the next few hours, the composition of its exco will be absolutely Umno-dominated with a maximum of only 2 non-Malay state ministers. No Indian.

The Sultan will have to consider this crucial factor as the Perak electorate had crossed the political rubicon only months ago, where absolute dominance of Umno in the state exco — hence the state’s purse-strings — was given a resounding rejection.

The only consolation for the Sultan is that, whatever way he so decides, he has no political masters to report to. Unlike the politicians, he doesn’t have to face the voters in the next general election while the people-funded allowances payable to the royal family, as enshrined in the Constitution, will remain intact.

Do MCA, MIC and Gerakan want it?

However, the MCA, Gerakan and MIC must collectively decide if they so condone the new, politically destructive scenario that celebrates a party-hopping culture — irrespective of the the quality of the YBs – that offers Umno the ultimate controlling stake that dictates the future of Perak. If they decide against the wishes of the voters, they may face humiliating annihilation in GE2012. Because the people will be angry if they consent to absolute Umno dominance.

How will the Sultan, who will soon celebrate the silver anniversary as the state’s ruler, decide? His son, Raja Nazrin the crown prince, has prophetically said his eloquent piece on the outset of the political turmoil that just turned awry hours ago, that the Royal Family “must remain neutral to ensure justice for people”.

Guan Eng used to comment on the decadence in governance in Penang before GE2008, that devils romp because good men do nothing.

I fervently believe the Sultan of Perak is a good man.

And I fervently believe, too, that Guan Eng will appreciate the fact that DAP is the biggest loser once Perak government changes hands.

What can Perak people do? Bite the bullet, fight another day.
_________________________________________________________

I have this kind of feeling. When BN assemblyman or MP crossed over to PR, no one from PR condemns them for being “unfaithful” to the party (of course their former BN comrades condemned them for their action). But when PR assemblyman or MP crossed over to BN, it’s create a whole hoo-haa in PR coalition.

At the end of the day, no one is happy if one member crossing to another “village” in order to survive. Bear in mind, once they been labelled as “frog”, they will not stop there because the nature of a frog is jumping and leaping from one place to another. If they feel uncomfortable at one place, they will jump again.

I agree with Datuk Seri Wong Chun Wai that we need to have anti-hopping laws to prevent this kind of drama from happening again.

One party called for assembly to be dissolved so that people in Perak can decide for a government that they want.

Another party informed that they have the majority to form a new goverment in Perak.

But both of them admitted that authority lies on Sultan’s hand. Finally Sultan Azlan Shah had given his order for current PR state govt to leave their offices, but to my dismay, it’s seem they disobey Sultan’s order.

My question for both parties is: Is it for the sake of your power or for the sake of rakyat? Get down to work la….

PR wants to dissolve the state assembly because they know that they will return to govern Perak through mandate given by Perakians…

BN wants to form a new govt without dissolving the assembly because they know they have the majority.

Both are looking for power and authority to rule Perak.

No matter what. Guys, final decision is on the hand of Sultan. Follow his order and get down to work la…plz………

Christians, do pray for Perak. May the Lord have mercy on them.

ena0116l

Abu: Ali, Ali…Quickly come and see!!!

Ali: What is it??…

Abu: This frog can jump from one place to another place wor…

Ali: Abu, what so special about leaping frogs or jumping frogs? They are being created to jump one la….haiya…

Abu: Hmmm, ya ohhh..

Ali: You think, frogs are created to be crawl ahh…

Abu: No lah…

Ali: Just do your work la, staring at jumping frogs pulak….

Abu: I’m reading newspaper just now and found out some interesing news lo….(http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/2/3/nation/3182069&sec=nation) and (http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/2/3/nation/3181896&sec=nation)

Ali: I’m just wondering these people ahh….Haih, I also don’t know how to comments la…Whether they work themselves or for the people…We don’t know…

Abu: Yalor, sound so sad la…In-fightings, looking for personal benefits..What else…Representatives are elected to serve “rakyat”….

Ali: I really hope that they are not “frogs” but “ants” which works hard for their little kingdom..Maybe those “frogs” can watch the movie of “antz”…

Abu: Maybe you can recommend all of them to watch lo…hahaha…